Eau Claire County vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated and Operating with a Prohibited Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) at a .32 Level Attorney Mullen with Mullen, Schlough & Associates SCconvinced prosecutors just hours before a jury trial the defendant was not operating his vehicle. Even though video tapes and statements differed as to who was actually driving the truck the evening of the incident, Attorney Mullen convinced the District Attorney's Office such a discrepancy was not worth risking a jury trial over. The case was dismissed in its entirety. ***Case Dismissed By Prosecutors}***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated(BAC .32)

Eau Claire County vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated and Operating with a Prohibited Alcohol Concentration at a .284 Level Through the showing of police tapes and direct testimony, Attorney Mullen established law enforcement failed to interview all the actors at the scene of an accident. One of the actors missed was the designated driver with the keys of the vehicle in his pocket during the time the defendant allegedly operated the vehicle. Three other individuals interviewed who worked for Emergency Medical Services were also impaired and leaving the bar. Attorney Mullen was able to show what actually happened that evening during the trial. Again the jury took little time in coming to a not guilty verdict. ***Not Guilty Jury Verdict***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated(BAC .284)

Rusk County vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated and Operating with a Prohibited Alcohol Concentration at a.09 Level Attorney Mullen with Mullen, Schlough & Associates SCestablished, through cross examination of the State's own expert witness during the jury trial, the defendant's blood alcohol level was between .05 and .07. Through a chronological "walk-through" of when each alcoholic beverage was consumed, the exact volume of each drink and other important factors necessary for the expert to form a calculated blood alcohol level estimate, Attorney Mullen got into evidence an expert witness opinion showing when the defendant was operating the vehicle, he/she did not have a prohibited blood alcohol level in his/her system. Even though the official blood alcohol results showed a prohibited blood alcohol level, it was established such a level was obtained only AFTER the defendant ceased operating the vehicle. ***Not Guilty Jury Verdict***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated(BAC .09)

Chippewa County vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated and Operating with a Prohibited Blood Alcohol Level (BAC) at a .09 Level Attorney Mullen with Mullen, Schlough & Associates SCestablished, through cross examination of the State's own expert witness during the jury trial, the defendant's blood alcohol level was between .05 and .07. Through a chronological "walk-through" of when each alcoholic beverage was consumed, the exact volume of each drink and other important factors necessary for the expert to form a calculated blood alcohol level estimate, Attorney Mullen got into evidence an expert witness opinion showing when the defendant was operating the vehicle, he/she did not have a prohibited blood alcohol level in his/her system. Even though the official blood alcohol results showed a prohibited blood alcohol level, it was established such a level was obtained only AFTER the defendant ceased operating the vehicle. ***Not Guilty Jury Verdict***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated(BAC .09)

Eau Claire County vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated and Operating with a Prohibited Blood Alcohol Level (BAC) at a .09 Level Attorney Mullen with Mullen, Schlough & Associates SCestablished, through cross examination of the State's own expert witness during the jury trial, the defendant's blood alcohol level was between .05 and .07. Through a chronological "walk-through" of when each alcoholic beverage was consumed, the exact volume of each drink and other important factors necessary for the expert to form a calculated blood alcohol level estimate, Attorney Mullen got into evidence an expert witness opinion showing when the defendant was operating the vehicle, he/she did not have a prohibited blood alcohol level in his/her system. Even though the official blood alcohol results showed a prohibited blood alcohol level, it was established such a level was obtained only AFTER the defendant ceased operating the vehicle. ***Not Guilty Jury Verdict***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated(BAC .09)

Burnett County vs, Citizen Accused of Operating Whille Intoxicated Defendant was charged with Operating While Intoxicated after being seen leaving a bar in a black pickup truck and supposedly the same pickup truck being found on the side of the road 30 minutes later. Attorney Mullen from Mullen, Schlough & Associates SC was able to show the court the defendant could not have driven the truck because it was not registered in his name. ***Case Dismissed By Court***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Operating While Intoxicated

Chippewa County vs. Citizen Accused of 2nd Degree Sexual Assault and Attempted Sexual Assault of a Child Attorney Mullen with the Mullen, Schlough & Associates SChad a client charged with sexual assault crimes. During the numerous hearings before trial, the victim recited her version of the incident at the onset. The story changed every time. By the time of trial, she stated the version she gave during the preliminary hearing was wrong. Additionally Attorney Mullen established a third-party defendant, establishing another might have committed the act. The defendant was quickly found not guilty by a jury. ***Not Guilty Jury Verdict***
State vs. Citizen Accused of 2nd Degree Sexual Assault

Chippewa County vs. Citizen Accused of Battery by an Inmate and 2nd Degree Sexual Assault The State could not show our client physically assaulted a fellow inmate during a preliminary hearing. Upon suggestion a continuance would be granted in order to allow the State time to prepare their case, he convinced the court not to allow it thereby ending the prosecution of the alleged felony. Immediately afterwards at the next preliminary hearing scheduled that day, Attorney Mullen established a sexual assault was not committed by showing the elements of the crime were not met. Within thirty minutes, Attorney Mullen had won two preliminary hearings ending two felony cases. ***2 Felonies Dismiss By The Court Within 45 Minutes***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Battery by an Inmate and 2nd Degree Sexual Assault

Eau Claire County vs. Citizen Accused of Substantial Battery The client was charged with Substantial Battery. Attorney Mullen was able, through his knowledge of the court process and how the system actually works, to get the case totally dismissed. ***Case Dismissed By Court***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Substantial Battery

Eau Claire County vs. Domestic Disorderly Conduct and Domestic Battery Attorney Mullen showed the prosecution, due to the nature of relationships among all parties involved, such a case would be fruitless for the State to try to win at trial. Such cases were dismissed entirely due to Attorney Mullen and various prosecutors experience in such areas. ***Case Dismissed Upon Defense Motion)***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Domestic Disorderly Conduct & Domestic Battery

Taylor County vs. Citizen Accused of Multiple First Degree Sexual Assault and Armed Robbery A client had been charged with multiple felony counts that could have led to over 150 years of imprisonment. The attorneys at Mullen, Schlough & Associates SC were able to investigate the matter and show that law enforcement did not properly investigate and jumped to conclusions based upon faulty voice recognition. Testimony elicited on cross examination of the alleged victim indicated a large number of inconsistencies and reasonable doubt lead to acquittal. ***Not Guilty Prosecutors Motion To Dismiss***
State vs. Citizen Accused of Multiple First Degree Sexual Assault & Armed Robbery

Our Attorneys

Proving Answers & Peace of Mind During Litigation Chaos
Mark Mullen

Mark R. Mullen

Managing Partner – Business Operations

Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin

OWI Defense
Email: mark.mullen@msa-attorneys.com
Mobile: (715) 828-4780

Attorney Mark Mullen spends most of his time managing Mullen, Schlough & Associates S.C. He uses his business education along with extensive knowledge of everyday law firm operations combined with 10 years courtroom experience to insure attorneys with the firm provide quality legal representation. In addition, he believes and strives to insure successful attorneys start with an organized office environment with highly trained and experienced staff providing attorneys to have only one issue on their minds: winning the case.

Scott S. Schlough

Scott S. Schlough

Managing Partner – Legal Services

Menomonie, Wisconsin

Criminal Defense & OWI Defense
Email: scott.schlough@msa-attorneys.com
Mobile: (715) 821-1287

Attorney Schlough attended the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities where he studied Political Science and Communications. He also had to opportunity to complete two internships in the Minnesota government, first with the Minnesota House of Representatives and then with former Governor Tim Pawlenty. After completing his bachelor’s degree, he immediately enrolled in law school at William Mitchell College of Law. While at William Mitchell, Attorney Schlough was active in the Phi Alpha Delta law fraternity and was also president of the Ski and Snowboard club at William Mitchell. He is licensed in both Minnesota and Wisconsin.

sawan-homepage

Sawan Talwar

Practicing Attorney – Legal Services

Eau Claire, Wisconsin

Criminal Defense & OWI Defense
Email: sawan.talwar@msa-attorneys.com
Mobile: 715-497-8391

Sawan attended the University of Wisconsin – La Crosse, where he received a bachelor’s degree in microbiology. After spending time in the workforce, he later attended Minnesota State University, Mankato, where he received a master’s degree in biology. Coming from a science-heavy background, Sawan found his calling in criminal defense, by being able to combine his past experiences with the legal field. While in law school, Sawan spent a portion of his time getting practicable, real-world experience. At the University of St. Thomas School of Law, Sawan participated in the Misdemeanor Defense Externship, being place in Hennepin County. Additionally, he participated in the Law School’s Trademark Clinic and Compliance Externship. He also participated in serval clubs and was a part of a mentorship program for younger students. Outside of the Law School, Sawan was a law clerk for a criminal defense firm in Bloomington, MN before joining Mullen, Schlough, & Associates, S.C.

Sawan believes that helping the client understand the legal process and education is at the forefront of effective defense. He understands that while some people have been through the system before, others have not and providing guidance is the first step for building trust.

Our Prices & Payment Plans

Criminal Defense

Felonies

Starting at $6000
Half Required Down Before We Start
Criminal Defense

Misdemeanors

Starting at $4500
Half Required Down Before We Start
Popular
OWI/DUI Defense

1st to 3rd

Starting at $4500
Half Required Down Before We Start
OWI/DUI Defense

4th+

Starting at $6000
Half Required Down Before We Start

Attorneys Working with Clients Getting A Reasonable Result You Can Live With

OWI Case
Attorney - Mark Mullen
“I just wanted to say thank you for giving me a 2nd chance in life. I was able to overcome the accident, and because of the plea deal that I received, I was able to start over and get my life back. At first, it was hard getting a job, but (some company) gave me an opportunity as an agent, and I’m making the most of it. I hope that the other clients that you serve can be helped as much as you helped me. Thanks Again.”
- Collen Risher
OWI Case – ’12
Attorney - Scott Schlough
” Back in December 2012 I was charged with a 2nd offence D.U.I. due to a vehicle crash I created while driving drunk. The next morning after being let out of jail I went across the street to Mullen, Schlough & Associates. I presented my case to Attorney Scott Schlough and Attorney Mark Mullen.  They took action right away, both Attorneys filed a motion with the DMV of Wisconsin to preserve my drivers license. "
- Rob Ciotti
OWI Case
Attorney - Mark Mullen
“I just wanted to say thank you for helping me out when you did. It now has been 3 years since I had gotten arrested and found you. I am thankful that you helped me and the whole experience has changed my life for the better and now I am helping out other people that were in my shoes to help turn their life better. Again, thank you for defending me. God Bless”

- Ruth Fane

Latest News