Through the showing of police tapes and direct testimony, Attorney Mullen established law enforcement failed to interview all the actors at the scene of an accident. One of the actors missed was the designated driver with the keys of the vehicle in his pocket during the time the defendant allegedly operated the vehicle. Three other individuals interviewed who worked for Emergency Medical Services were also impaired and leaving the bar. Attorney Mullen was able to show what actually happened that evening during the trial. Again the jury took little time in coming to a not guilty verdict.
Related Posts
23
FebFacing OWI, DUI or DWI in Wisconsin
Facing charges related to OWI, DUI, or DWI in Wisconsin, particularly in local counties like Barron, Chippewa, Dunn, Eau Claire, or Rice Lake, can be a daunting experience. Whether it’s your first offense or you’re dealing with a more complex situation involving drugs, underage drinking, or high blood alcohol concentrations (BAC), the legal process can feel overwhelming. […]
23
JanNavigating the Maze: Wisconsin’s Strict Stance on DUI Offenses and Second Offense Implications
Wisconsin has gained a reputation for taking a stern stance on DUI offenses, and individuals facing a second offense find themselves navigating a complex legal landscape. In this blog, we’ll explore the implications of Wisconsin’s strict DUI laws, focusing on key areas such as penalties, legal processes, and the importance of seeking experienced DUI defense. Understanding Wisconsin’s[…]
